TSABBAR v. AULD

Because plaintiff's agreements with other health care professionals granted an "exclusive right to use and occupy" part of plaintiff's apartment at certain times, they were not mere licenses, but subleases for which approval was required under plaintiff's proprietary lease with defendant cooperative corporation (see, Miller v. City of New York, 15 N.Y.2d 34).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.