FREUDENTHALER v. FORT JAMES OPERATING CO., (D.Or. 2000)

MALCOLM F. MARSH, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Donald C. Ashmanskas filed his Findings and Recommendation on September 6, 2000. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R. Civ P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. See § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-5 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Ashmanskas' Findings and Recommendation #82. Defendant's motion (#34) for summary judgment is DENIED with regard to defendant Freudenthaler and is GRANTED with regard to defendant Touch. Defendant's motion (#34) to strike is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.