Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Nov 13, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

The contention of defendant that the prosecutor improperly commented on his failure to testify, thereby depriving him of a fair trial, has not been preserved for our review ( see, CPL 470.05). After County Court's curative instruction, defense counsel neither objected further nor requested a mistrial. Thus, the curative instruction "must be deemed to have corrected the error to the defendant's satisfaction" ( People v. Heide, 84 N.Y.2d 943, 944; see, People v. Webb, 236 A.D.2d 872, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 865; People v. Bruce, 216 A.D.2d 913, 914, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 872). In any event, the prosecutor's comment "was `not of such character as would naturally and reasonably be interpreted by the jury as adverse comment on defendant's failure to take the stand'" ( People v. Tascarella, 227 A.D.2d 888, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 867, quoting People v. Burke, 72 N.Y.2d 833, 836, rearg denied 72 N.Y.2d 953).