PEOPLE v. JONES

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Because Supreme Court did not advise defendant of the potential periods of incarceration, the waiver by defendant of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence ( see, People v. Cormack, 269 A.D.2d 815; People v. Wynn, 262 A.D.2d 1052). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation ( see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147).