- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
ALVAREZ v. AARON, (E.D.Cal. 2000)
EDWARD GARCIA, District Judge.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).
On November 1, 2000, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 1, 2000, are adopted in full;
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice;
3. Plaintiff's motion for judgment by demand filed March 6, 2000, and again on March 27, 2000, and amended March 28, 2000, and April 6, 2000, is denied;
4. Plaintiff's motion for "lien/levy abatement" filed March 29, 2000, is denied;
5. Plaintiff's ex parte motion for trial by certificate filed May 8, 2000, is denied; and
6. Plaintiff's motion to supplement filed October 4, 2000, is denied.
Alert