- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PALCHIK v. EISENBERG
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 12, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly struck the testimony of the plaintiff's expert, since it went beyond the scope of the allegations contained in the bill of particulars (see, Ciriello v. Virgues, 156 A.D.2d 417).
Moreover, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for judgment in their favor as a matter of law since the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence (see, Galler v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 99 A.D.2d 720).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.