Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

COLONNA v. SUAREZ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 19, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A rear-end collision with a stopped vehicle creates a prima facie case of liability with respect to the operator of the moving vehicle and imposes a duty of explanation upon him or her (see, Maschka v. Newman, 262 A.D.2d 615; Danza v. Longieliere, 256 A.D.2d 434; Niemiec v. Jones, 237 A.D.2d 267). However, a "driver of a motor vehicle has a duty to keep proper control of that vehicle, and to not stop suddenly or slow down without proper signaling so as to avoid a collision" (Niemiec v. Jones, supra, at 268). There exist triable issues of fact concerning whether the defendant Raymond Suarez contributed to the accident by making a sudden stop and in failing to perceive the road conditions ahead (see, Maschka v. Newman, supra).