PEOPLE v. SOTO

The court properly admitted testimony that, two weeks prior to his murder, the deceased pointed out defendant to the witness, his fiancée, and identified him as a person with whom he had been involved in an argument. As the court carefully instructed the jury, this evidence was not received to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but rather to show the effect it had on the ability of the witness to accurately identify defendant (see, People v. Haywood, 264 A.D.2d 633,lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 863; People v. Gonzalez, 223 A.D.2d 653, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 848).

Defendant's claim that certain testimony that had been precluded by the court was introduced nonetheless is unavailing because it rests upon an error in the trial transcript. During jury deliberations this issue came to the attention of the court, which subsequently conducted an inquiry of the court reporter and found the typed transcript to be in error. Defendant expressly waived any objection to this determination. In any event, we conclude that the People have rebutted the presumption of regularity and that the court's determination was correct (see, People v. Childs, 247 A.D.2d 319, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 849).

Motion seeking leave to file a pro se supplemental brief denied.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.