PEOPLE v. PIERCE

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of his right to challenge any rulings made by the Supreme Court encompassed his right to review the denial of those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and statements he made to law enforcement officials (see, People v. Kemp, 94 N.Y.2d 831; People v. Brathwaite, 263 A.D.2d 89; People v. Toye, 264 A.D.2d 401). Accordingly, review of the issues raised by the defendant on this appeal is precluded.