- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SIEKIERDA v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District.
Dec 22, 2000
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, the order of the common pleas court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCafferty, 563 Pa. 46, 758 A.2d 1155 (2000), and Commonwealth v. Harrington, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).
Mr. Justice Cappy files a concurring statement.
MR. JUSTICE CAPPY.
I join in the per curiam reversal and remand for the reasons set forth more fully in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp. v. Harrington, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386 (2000).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.