POINCY v. WHITE BUS COMPANY, INC

ORDERED that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, and the answer is reinstated.

It is well settled that a defendant attempting to vacate a default must establish a reasonable excuse for the default, a meritorious defense, and a lack of prejudice to the nonmoving party (see, Morgese v. Laro Maintenance Corp., 251 A.D.2d 307; Albin v. First Nationwide Network Mtge. Co., 188 A.D.2d 575). A court may, in its discretion, accept a claim of law office failure as satisfying the reasonable excuse requirement (see, CPLR 2005; cf., Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333). Here, the defendants' claim of law office failure was sufficient to establish reasonable excuse. Furthermore, the defendants demonstrated a meritorious defense, and, since the evidence sought by the plaintiffs' discovery was not significant to the central issues to be litigated, there was no evidence of prejudice to the plaintiffs. Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants' motion.