Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MATTER OF GAMBARDELLA v. ORTOV LIGHTING, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 27, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A party seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious claim or defense (see, Parker v. City of New York, 272 A.D.2d 310; Lovario v. Vuotto, 266 A.D.2d 191; Wynne v. Wagner, 262 A.D.2d 556). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse for a default lies within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, Parker v. City of New York, supra). We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default or a meritorious defense to the proceeding. Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion.