PRINS v. ITKOWITZ GOTTLIEB, P.C

Plaintiff is not entitled to compensation for his "services" to defendants attorneys as an insurance "expediter". The services he rendered were the basis for his arrest and indictment on extortion charges, and constituted a fee-splitting arrangement contrary to public policy. "[I]t is the settled law of this State . . . that a party to an illegal contract cannot ask a court of law to help him carry out his illegal object, nor can such a person plead or prove in any court a case in which he, as a basis for his claim, must show forth his illegal purpose." (United Calendar Mfg. Corp. v. Huang, 94 A.D.2d 176, 180, quoting Stone v. Freeman, 298 N.Y. 268, 271). The $5000 sanction was properly imposed, there being no merit whatsoever to the action, which was brought primarily to harass ( 22 NYCRR 130-1.1[a];[c][1],[2]). By the same token, we find the prosecution of this appeal to be wholly without merit and brought to harass defendants-respondents. Accordingly, on this occasion, we impose sanctions against plaintiff-appellant's attorney to the extent indicated.