MATTER OF HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY v. KHAN

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that the determination of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless it could not have been reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence, particularly in cases resting in large part on the credibility of witnesses (see, Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490; Matter of Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co. v. Dabush, 264 A.D.2d 848; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. McMahon, 251 A.D.2d 571; Matter of Aetna Life Cas. v. Gramazio, 242 A.D.2d 530). The determination that there was no physical contact between the appellant's vehicle and an unidentified vehicle is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence.