MATTER OF GLUCK

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the appellants personally.

The determination of a reasonable attorney's fee in a matter concerning an estate is within the sound discretion of the Surrogate's Court (see, DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete, 70 N.Y.2d 879, 881). The Surrogate is in the best position to assess the factors essential to fix an attorney's fee, such as the reasonable value of the time, effort, and skill required and actually expended (see, Nicastro v. Park, 186 A.D.2d 805; Lefkowitz v. Van Ess, 166 A.D.2d 556; Shrauger v. Shrauger, 146 A.D.2d 955, 956). This authority rests with the Surrogate regardless of the terms of a retainer agreement (see, Matter of Lanyi, 147 A.D.2d 644) or any agreement between the interested parties consenting to the amount of compensation requested (see, Matter of Von Hofe, 145 A.D.2d 424; see also, Matter of Phelan, 173 A.D.2d 621; Matter of Verplanck, 151 A.D.2d 767). The appellants failed to demonstrate that the compensation awarded by the Surrogate was not reasonable, or that they were entitled to a higher fee. Therefore, the Surrogate's determination was a provident exercise of discretion (see, Matter of Lanyi, supra).

The appellants' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.