Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MURPHY v. M.B. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Feb 5, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants.

On January 16, 1996, the plaintiff slipped and fell on ice in a parking lot owned by the defendant Northern Westchester Park Associates (hereinafter Northern). Northern had a written contract with American Indoor Outdoor Maintenance Care, Inc. (hereinafter American), to provide outdoor maintenance services, including snow removal.

American's contract with Northern did not constitute "a comprehensive and exclusive property maintenance obligation which the parties could have reasonably expected to displace [the property owner's] duty, as landowner, to maintain the property safely" (Riekers v. Gold Coast Plaza, 255 A.D.2d 373, 374). Accordingly, American cannot be held liable to third parties for personal injuries arising from negligent performance (see, Landau v. Ocean Side Cove Homeowners, 265 A.D.2d 381, 382; Sapone v. Commercial Bldg. Maintenance Corp., 262 A.D.2d 393, 394). Further, American cannot be held liable to the plaintiff on the theory that it created or exacerbated a dangerous condition (see, Pavlovich v. Wade Assocs., 274 A.D.2d 382).

If in fact an injury can be attributable solely to negligent performance or nonperformance of an act solely within the province of the contractor, then the contractor may be held liable for indemnification to an owner (see, 17 Vista Fee Assocs. v. Teachers Ins. Annuity Assn. of Am., 259 A.D.2d 75; McBride v. Stewart's Ice Cream Co., 262 A.D.2d 776; Boskey v. Gazza Props., 248 A.D.2d 344, 346; Keshavarz v. Murphy, 242 A.D.2d 680).

Under the particular facts of this case, the causes of action for indemnification were properly dismissed (see, Oppenheim v. One School St. Professional Corp., 263 A.D.2d 472, 473).