Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. CRAIG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 5, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the County Court erred in failing to order a hearing into the circumstances surrounding his discharge from the Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) program is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Mackey, 77 N.Y.2d 846; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Brown, 242 A.D.2d 337), and, in any event, without merit (see, People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.