TOMLINSON v. ALLEN CANNING COMPANY

This matter comes on review before the Full Commission on the claimant's Motion for Rule on the Clerk. After careful consideration of this Motion, and all other matters properly before the Commission, we find that the claimant's Motion for Rule on the Clerk must be denied.

The Commission simply does not have the authority to waive or extend the appeal time, even with the consent of all parties, or if the delay is a result of unavoidable casualty. Cooper Industrial Products v. Meadows, 5 Ark. App. 205, 634 S.W.2d 400 (1982); Williams v. Luft Construction Co., 31 Ark. App. 198, 790 S.W.2d 921 (1990).

Accordingly, we find that the claimant's Motion for Rule on the Clerk should be and hereby is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________ ELDON F. COFFMAN, Chairman

_______________________________ MIKE WILSON, Commissioner

_______________________________ SHELBY W. TURNER, Commissioner