PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to object to the procedure used by the Supreme Court to dismiss a sworn juror and therefore that issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; see, also, People v. Starks, 248 A.D.2d 1003; People v. Schenck, 209 A.D.2d 453; People v. Ricciardi, 199 A.D.2d 432). The defendant's failure to object deprived this court of a record on which we could exercise intelligent judicial review of his contentions (see, People v. Camacho, 90 N.Y.2d 558; People v. Kinchen, 60 N.Y.2d 772; People v. Thompson, 262 A.D.2d 666). We decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.15).