Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SORCE v. GREAT OAK MARINA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Apr 16, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The injured plaintiff Vincent Sorce (hereinafter the plaintiff) stored his boat for the winter on property owned by the defendant Great Oak Marina (hereinafter the marina). The boat was stored on cement blocks under a row of hemlock trees. The plaintiff was injured when he went to the boat to retrieve some of his belongings. As he climbed onto the boat's swim platform, he pushed aside a heavy tree branch, which broke and caused him to fall.

The Supreme Court properly granted the marina's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The tree branches overhanging the plaintiff's boat did not constitute an inherently dangerous condition on the property (see, Plessias v. John Vincent Scalia Home for Funerals, 271 A.D.2d 423; Pepic v. Joco Realty, 216 A.D.2d 95; Pilato v. Diamond, 209 A.D.2d 393; see generally, Macey v. Truman, 70 N.Y.2d 918, amended 71 N.Y.2d 949; Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233). Furthermore, since the tree branch could be readily observed by the reasonable use of one's senses, the marina had no duty to warn the plaintiff of the condition (see, Doyle v. State of New York, 271 A.D.2d 394; Binensztok v. Marshall Stores, 228 A.D.2d 534; Ackermann v. Town of Fishkill, 201 A.D.2d 441).

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, McGINITY and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.