- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
DIXSON v. STATE
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 30, 2001
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Rhodes v. State, 701 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (Neither defense attorney nor trial court is required to warn defendant of sentence-enhancing consequences that defendant's plea will have as to any future crimes defendant may commit; neither trial court nor defense counsel has duty to anticipate defendant's recidivism.)
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.