Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. JAMES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jun 25, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly refused to consider manslaughter in the second degree as a lesser-included offense of either murder in the second degree or manslaughter in the first degree since no reasonable view of the evidence supported such a charge (see, People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61; People v. Kelly, 221 A.D.2d 661, appeal denied 87 N.Y.2d 974, cert denied 517 U.S. 1200; People v. Evans, 192 A.D.2d 671; People v. Vanier, 178 A.D.2d 501). There is no reasonable view of the evidence that would allow a fact-finder to conclude that the defendant may have acted with a reckless disregard of a substantial risk to the decedent, but not with the intent to seriously injure him (cf., People v. Morel, 213 A.D.2d 497; People v. Cook, 96 A.D.2d 1059).

The defendant's sentence was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

RITTER, J.P., FLORIO, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.