Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF BERZON

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Jul 12, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Claimant, a licensed contractor, was employed during the construction season as the manager of his son's home remodeling business. Each winter, he was placed on seasonal layoff status and received unemployment insurance benefits. During this period, claimant was found to have done some work for the business, which included writing checks and obtaining building permits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he was not totally unemployed and, due to his willful misrepresentations, he was charged with a recoverable overpayment and the loss of benefit days. We find this decision to be supported by substantial evidence and affirm it. A claimant who is involved in the operation of a business is not totally unemployed within the meaning of the Labor Law, even if the work was minimal and there were no financial benefits (see, Matter of Kaganovich [Commissioner of Labor], 254 A.D.2d 670). Willful false statements made to obtain such benefits render them recoverable (see,Matter of Sheinfeld [Sweeney], 245 A.D.2d 943; Matter of Bartfeld [Sweeney], 239 A.D.2d 642, 643).

Cardona, P.J., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.