- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. STYLES
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jul 16, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDERED that the amended sentence is affirmed.
The sentencing court may properly consider evidence of other crimes for which the defendant was not tried provided the court is satisfied that "the information upon which it bases the sentence is reliable and accurate" (People v. Naranjo, 89 N.Y.2d 1047, 1049, see, People v. Outley, 80 N.Y.2d 702, 712). The court was entitled to treat the defendant's admission to criminal activity, made under oath in an unrelated proceeding, as reliable (see, People v. Migliore, 150 A.D.2d 169; People v. Marrero, 110 A.D.2d 785).
BRACKEN, P.J., RITTER, GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and TOWNES, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.