MORTILLARO v. PUBLIC SERVICE MUT. INS

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the respondent.

A plaintiff need not be privy to an insurance contract to commence a declaratory judgment action to determine the rights and obligations of the respective parties, so long as the plaintiff stands to benefit from the policy (see, Watson v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 246 A.D.2d 57; Tepedino v. Zurich-American Ins. Group, 220 A.D.2d 579; Costa v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co., 204 A.D.2d 591). Here, the plaintiffs clearly stand to benefit from the professional liability policy issued by the defendant American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company (hereinafter AISL), to the plaintiffs' insurance broker, the defendant Romania Insurance Brokerage, Inc. (hereinafter Romania). Accordingly, the plaintiffs are entitled to challenge the disclaimer of coverage issued by AISL prior to obtaining a judgment against Romania, and the Supreme Court erred in granting the motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against AISL.

RITTER, J.P., McGINITY, LUCIANO and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.