Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. BAKER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Sep 17, 1998
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of assault in the second degree and was sentenced to a prison term of 1 1/2 to 3 years. Contrary to defendant's contention, there is no basis to conclude that County Court failed to consider the presentence investigation report ( see, People v. Kalakowski, 120 A.D.2d 763, 765, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 669). While the sentence imposed exceeded that recommended in the presentence investigation report, the court was not bound by the recommendation of the Probation Department ( see, People v. Jarvis, 233 A.D.2d 632, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 943) and, in any event, adequately set forth its reasons for imposing the ultimate sentence. Given that defendant was permitted to plead guilty to a lesser crime than that with which he was originally charged and the fact that he was sentenced to the most lenient indeterminate sentence authorized by statute, we reject defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive and should be reduced in the interest of justice.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.