- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. PIEDISCALZO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 15, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention regarding the validity of his plea as he did not move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v. Gilchrist, 280 A.D.2d 488; People v. Naglieri, 262 A.D.2d 426), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
The defendant's contention that his sentence was excessive is without merit (see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).
O'BRIEN, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY, SCHMIDT and TOWNES, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.