- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. WEATHERS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 29, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.
Nothing in the record supports the defendant's contention that there was a conflict of interest between himself and defense counsel. The defendant's arguments as to the effectiveness of his representation concerning matters which are dehors the record are not reviewable on direct appeal (see, People v. Zito, 234 A.D.2d 614; People v. Lawrence, 100 A.D.2d 944; People v. Penna, 70 A.D.2d 646).
The sentence was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
RITTER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, S. MILLER and FLORIO, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.