Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. VAN ALLEN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 30, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

The record supports the court's independent finding, following a recommendation by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, that defendant, a parolee convicted in 1986 of sex crimes against children, should be designated a level-three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act, and thus subjected to the most stringent reporting requirements imposed by the statute (see, People v. Bottisti, 285 A.D.2d 841, 727 N.Y.S.2d 787). The court properly refused to reduce defendant's status to level two. Although defendant has been involved in a number of rehabilitation programs, the cumulative total of points as calculated by the Board clearly exceeded the threshold for a level-three rating. The court properly considered all relevant risk factors, including evidence that defendant victimized children other than the three complainants in his underlying case. We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining arguments.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.