Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. BADGER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Nov 26, 2001
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The determination whether to permit the withdrawal of a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court (see, People v. Marzocco, 278 A.D.2d 515; People v. McAllister, 248 A.D.2d 641; People v. Flakes, 240 A.D.2d 428). The defendant's unsubstantiated claim of innocence was refuted by an earlier admission of guilt (see, People v. Marzocco, supra; People v. McAllister, supra; People v. Flakes, supra). Thus, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without a hearing (see, People v. Marzocco, supra; People v. McAllister, supra; People v. Flakes, supra; cf., People v. De Jesus, 199 A.D.2d 529).

RITTER, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, TOWNES and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.