- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
U.S. v. JAMES
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Feb 13, 2002
AMENDED OPINION
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Upon motion by the defendant, Edward James, for a rehearing, and good cause having been shown, and upon the concession by the government that at the time of the entry of the plea of guilty by James that the government could not have adduced any additional proof on the interstate commerce element under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. ยง 1951, as to James than it did at trial against the codefendants, Selena Turner and Kevin Larkins, our opinion of November 28, 2001, is amended to reflect that the conviction and sentence of James are REVERSED.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.