IN THE MATTER OF BROUWER v. PACICCA

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Where, as here, an order indicates on its face that it was made on consent, it is not appealable (see, Matter of Garcia v. Carballo, 277 A.D.2d 453; Matter of Chiakpo v. Obi, 255 A.D.2d 579; Matter of Hartnett v. Hartnett, 242 A.D.2d 535; Matter of Larkin-King v. King, 159 A.D.2d 626; CPLR 5511). To the extent that the appellant attacks the propriety of certain portions of the order on the ground that they were not made on his consent, his remedy is to move in the Family Court to vacate or resettle the order (see, Nayman v. Remsen Apartments, 125 A.D.2d 378; Bacon v. Lowman, 8 A.D. 612).

KRAUSMAN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.