STATE v. SHARPE

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rubin v. State, 390 So.2d 322 (Fla. 1980) (holding that amended information may only "relate back" where the original information was timely filed); State v. Adjmi, 170 So.2d 340, 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964) (holding that "[subsequent] informations will not be subject to the statute of limitations when they are shown to be connected with and in continuation of a prosecution timely begun").

STONE, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.