Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. CARTER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Feb 28, 2002
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence premised on the fact that part of the transaction occurred in a lobby and therefore did not occur on "school grounds" as defined by Penal Law ยง 220.00(14) is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the People established beyond a reasonable doubt that the drug transaction, viewed as a whole, occurred on school grounds within the meaning of the statute (see, People v. Perez, 277 A.D.2d 1, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 737).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.