PENKALSKI v. McCALL

Rose, J.

Petitioner, a police officer, sustained a disabling knee injury when he slipped and fell on wet grass while chasing a suspect. Ruling that petitioner did not sustain an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law, respondent denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits. In this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the determination, petitioner claims that his slip and fall on wet grass was sudden and unexpected and, therefore, an accident. We disagree.

Crucial to the finding of an accident in cases of this nature is "a precipitating accidental event * * * which was not a risk of the work performed" (Matter of McCambridge v. McGuire, 62 N.Y.2d 563, 567-568). Thus, "[u]nless the injury results from an event that would not ordinarily be anticipated in the context of the worker's employment, it cannot be defined as an `accidental' injury" (Matter of Butler v. McCall, 247 A.D.2d 709, 710). In chasing a suspect, petitioner was certainly engaged in police work and, in the performance of this work, exposure to a variety of conditions, including wet grass, was an inherent risk that would ordinarily be anticipated. Accordingly, respondent could rationally conclude that petitioner's slip and fall on the wet grass encountered during the chase was a risk of the work performed (see,Matter of O'Donnell v. New York State Local Retirement Sys., 249 A.D.2d 607; Matter of Minchak v. McCall, 246 A.D.2d 952). The determination is, therefore, confirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.