Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. CAMPBELL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Apr 25, 2002
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The record supports the court's determination that, in the course of a valid traffic stop, defendant's sudden placement of his hand behind his back was sufficiently suspicious to warrant the officer's minimal intrusion (see, People v. DeBour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 221; see also,People v. Cruz, 43 N.Y.2d 786) of placing his own hand on defendant's back to prevent him from possibly drawing a weapon. When defendant turned away from the officer, the officer's hand slipped down defendant's back to the waistband area, resulting in the officer's accidental feeling of a hard object that the officer recognized to be a pistol. The officer's instinctive self-protective action was not a frisk, nor even an attempt to ascertain whether a weapon was present (see, People v. Chin, 192 A.D.2d 413, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 1071).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.