PEOPLE v. COOPER

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence warrants the conclusion that defendant was well aware of the frivolous nature of his various claims that he was exempt from paying taxes, and that he possessed the requisite intent for each of the crimes of which he was convicted.

The hearing court properly found defendant competent to stand trial. The court conducted the hearing in accordance with statutory requirements, and there is nothing in CPL 730.30 or in the court's sua sponte responsibilities concerning mental competency (see Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375) that obligated the court to call witnesses that neither party wished to call. We note that defendant, through counsel, asserted that he was fit to proceed and called an expert who testified to that effect.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.