- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. DiSIMONE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 7, 2002
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contentions, reversal is not required based on a Brady violation (see Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83). At a minimum, the information was disclosed to the defendant in time to give him a meaningful opportunity to use it (see People v. Cortijo, 70 N.Y.2d 868, 870; People v. Ahmed, 244 A.D.2d 415).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 85-86).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit or do not require reversal.
RITTER, J.P., SANTUCCI, GOLDSTEIN and MASTRO, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.