- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ANDREW
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Nov 12, 2002
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to satisfy his burden of coming forward with substantial evidence to rebut the presumption of regularity that attaches to all criminal proceedings (see People v. Robinson, 191 A.D.2d 523) regarding his claim that the court deprived him of the right to be present during the issuance of supplemental jury instructions (see People v. Mehmedi, 69 N.Y.2d 759, 760; People v. Rodriguez, 256 A.D.2d 478).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, FRIEDMANN and RIVERA, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.