Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. NORWOOD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Nov 15, 2002
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law ยง 125.25) and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of incarceration of 25 years to life. There is no merit to the contention of defendant that he was deprived of a fair trial by remarks made by the prosecutor in his opening statement. Further, the evidence against defendant was not wholly circumstantial, and thus Supreme Court did not err in denying defendant's request for a circumstantial evidence charge ( see People v. Guidice, 83 N.Y.2d 630, 636; People v. Rumble, 45 N.Y.2d 879, 880-881; People v. Bretagna, 298 N.Y. 323, 325-326, cert denied 336 U.S. 919, reh denied 336 U.S. 922).