EMODY v. MEDTRONIC INC., (N.D.Ala. 2003)

WILLIAM M. ACKER, Jr., United States District Judge

In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, the court finds that there are no genuine disputes of material fact and that defendants, Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danke USA, Inc., are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Therefore, defendants' Rule 56 motion is GRANTED. Consistent with this ruling, the action of plaintiff is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Costs are taxed against plaintiff.