IN THE MATTER OF SHARONDA S

ORDERED that the appeals from the fact-finding orders are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as those orders were superseded by the orders of disposition; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeals from so much of the orders of disposition as placed the children in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of 12 months are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the period of placement has expired; and it is further,

ORDERED that the orders of disposition are affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from so much of the orders of disposition as placed the children in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services (hereinafter the Commissioner) for a period of 12 months must be dismissed, as those portions of the orders were entered on the mother's consent (see Matter of Fatima Mc., 292 A.D.2d 532, 533; Matter of Jonathan G., 278 A.D.2d 324). In any event, the appeals from those portions of the orders are academic, as the orders of disposition expired by their own terms on June 8, 2001 (see Matter of Fatima Mc., supra; Matter of Jonathan G., supra). However, the adjudications of neglect have not been rendered academic (see Matter of B. Children, 267 A.D.2d 307; Matter of Danielle C., 253 A.D.2d 431).

The petitioner filed allegations of child abuse when the mother's eight-month-old son David sustained a fractured femur under circumstances that his doctors found suspicious. The petitioner successfully established a prima facie case of abuse by a preponderance of the evidence that this injury would not normally have occurred absent an act or omission of the parent (see Family Ct Act § 1012[e], 1046[a][ii], [b][i]; Matter of Philip M., 82 N.Y.2d 238, 244). In response, the mother failed to provide a reasonable and adequate explanation for the injury (see Matter of Philip M., supra at 244-245; Matter of Shawniece E., 110 A.D.2d 900). The Family Court's assessment of the witnesses' credibility should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see Matter of Irene O., 38 N.Y.2d 776, 777; Matter of Katelyn E., 241 A.D.2d 494, 495; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. [Shevonne S.], 188 A.D.2d 528, 529). The finding of abuse was therefore proper (see Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Brittney C.], 242 A.D.2d 533; Matter of Marcus S., 123 A.D.2d 702). Furthermore, considering the evidence presented, the Family Court properly found derivative abuse with respect to the children Sharonda and Latrell (see Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Brittney C.], supra).

The Family Court's findings of neglect were also supported by evidence that the mother repeatedly used marijuana and failed to attend drug counseling (see Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][B]; Matter of Krewsean S. [Malikka S.], 273 A.D.2d 393, 394).

FLORIO, J.P., O'BRIEN, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.