Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. BEYAH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Feb 7, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law ยง 205.25). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court properly denied his motion seeking dismissal of the indictment based on a preindictment delay of over 12 months. We reject the contention of defendant that the delay violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see generally People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442, 444-445). We further reject the contention of defendant that his due process rights were violated by the preindictment delay (see generally People v. Singer, 44 N.Y.2d 241, 253-255).