- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. TALBERT
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 24, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims that the court deprived him of the right to be present during a replay of his videotaped statement which had been requested by the jury during its deliberation. However, the defendant failed to satisfy his burden of coming forward with substantial evidence to rebut the presumption of regularity which attaches to all criminal proceedings (see People v. Andrew, 299 A.D.2d 415; People v. Williams, 220 A.D.2d 788; People v. Davis, 151 A.D.2d 596).
RITTER, J.P., SANTUCCI, FEUERSTEIN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.