PEOPLE v. YOUNGBLOOD

The verdict was based on sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490).

Contrary to defendant's argument, the use of the less than optimally specific term "knife" in the indictment to describe the deadly weapon allegedly utilized by defendant in committing the charged robberies did not render the indictment jurisdictionally defective (see People v. Singleton, 72 N.Y.2d 845; People v. Delacruz, 247 A.D.2d 223).

The trial court properly permitted the People to introduce evidence of uncharged criminal conduct since such conduct clearly and convincingly demonstrated a unique modus operandi and was thus relevant to establishing defendant's identity as the perpetrator of the charged robberies (see People v. Martinez, 237 A.D.2d 217, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 941).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.