IN THE MATTER OF McGOWAN v. GUY

ADJUDGED that the determinations of the Industrial Board of Appeals dated May 24, 2000, and July 18, 2001, are confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

It is within the authority of the Industrial Board of Appeals (hereinafter the IBA) to revoke orders of compliance and civil penalties issued by the petitioner (see Matter of Hudacs v. Village of Watkins Glen, 208 A.D.2d 181). "Judicial review is limited to determining whether the record contains substantial evidence to support the IBA's decision and a rational basis for the IBA's revocation of petitioner's order" (Matter of Hudacs v. Village of Watkins Glen, supra at 183; see Matter of Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 214 A.D.2d 940, affd 90 N.Y.2d 342). The construction given to the statute under review by the IBA, which is the agency charged with its enforcement, should be upheld if not irrational or unreasonable (see Matter of Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc., supra; Matter of Hudacs v. Village of Watkins Glen, supra). Here, the IBA's determination regarding the wage rate in question was a rational and reasonable application of the Fair Labor Standards Act as adopted by the State of New York, and was supported by substantial evidence contained in the record. Accordingly, the determination of the IBA is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed.

SMITH, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.