- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
YATES v. MANSFIELD BD. OF EDN
Supreme Court of Ohio.
May 16, 2003
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. I is allowed. Briefing is to proceed on Proposition of Law No. I.
{¶ 2} The cause is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on Proposition of Law No. II consistent with Hubbard v. Canton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 97 Ohio St.3d 451, 2002-Ohio-6718, 780 N.E.2d 543.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O'Connor, JJ., concur.
Cook, J., dissents.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.