Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. NICHOLS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Jun 12, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of robbery in the second degree stemming from his participation in a robbery at a pizza parlor during which a codefendant displayed what appeared to be a revolver. Defendant was sentenced, as a second felony offender, in accordance with the plea agreement to a determinate prison term of 7 years to run consecutive with a seven-year sentence previously imposed in Rensselaer County. Defendant appeals, claiming that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive and should be reduced or modified to run concurrent with the Rensselaer County sentence. Defendant's general waiver of his right to appeal during the plea colloquy encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v. Hidalgo 91 N.Y.2d 733, 737). Nevertheless, were we to consider it, we would find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the agreed-upon sentence (see generally People v. French, 302 A.D.2d 751).

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.