- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
WESOLOWSKI v. WESOLOWSKI
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jun 16, 2003
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendant property owner's duty of care did not require him to shovel or otherwise remedy the snow and ice condition in a grassy area adjacent to the driveway where the plaintiff slipped and fell (see Rosenbloom v. City of New York, 254 A.D.2d 474; Garcia v. New York City Hous. Auth., 234 A.D.2d 102; Palmer v. Prescott, 208 A.D.2d 1065; Bacon v. Mussaw, 167 A.D.2d 741).
RITTER, J.P., FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.