Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

BROOKHILL-WILK 1, LLC v. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., 02-1145 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jun 27, 2003
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 02-1145.

Attorney(S)

Peter L. Berger, Levisohn, Lerner, Berger Langsam, LLP, of New York, New York, filed a response to the petition for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the response was Marilyn Neiman. David M. Barkan, Fish Richardson, P.C., of Redwood City, California, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc for defendant-appellee. With him on the petition was David M. Shaw, Vice President, Legal Affairs Corporate Counsel, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., of Sunnydale, California. Of counsel were Todd G. Miller and Dina Grinshpun, Fish Richardson, P.C., of San Diego, California; and Frank E. Scherkenbach, Fish Richardson, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts.

JUDGES

Alvin Anthony Schall

William Curtis Bryson

Richard Linn

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc was filed by the defendant-appellee, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the plaintiff-appellant. The petition for rehearing and response was referred first to the merits panel that heard this appeal, and thereafter, the petition for rehearing en banc and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED for limited purposes in a separate order.

(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

The mandate of the court will issue on July 7, 2003.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x